Final Paper
“But mostly the teachers had no idea of how to engage the imaginations of us kids who were scuttling along at the bottom of the pond.”(Mike Rose) It can be difficult relating a topic to a kid that does not want to know it and does not care about any scholastic achievements. It is doable though, with some effort and a little time. Getting back to the basics is key, keep the material to the point, show its relation to the real world. This is why this particular math function does this, this is how it woks, it is useful because. I would not bring anything more complex than that to the classroom, there is no need and more than likely, there would not be many if any interested in mathematical complexities. Math is useful for accomplishing these tasks. I would incorporate basic life scenarios in which math could be a useful tool. But if the class constantly was full of outbursts, even this basic approach would not work. So there is little to no leeway for disciplinary problems, that is why I would lead a strict classroom, realistic, fair, and above anything else, respectful to everyone. And I would expect this of the students. Discipline, respect, committed work, and using basic tools and incentives are all it would take to have a successful classroom.
Jerry Large say to “Hug your kids and Kiss their boo-boos, at least until you have to step back so they can develop grit.” There is no reason to coddle a student, letting them get away with anything they want. Discipline builds character. To have a successful classroom, it must be organized, there must be a mutual respect between the teacher and students. The students must know who is in charge. Dan Brown tells his readers of such an issue, stating “During my first lesson boisterous Fausto earned raucous giggles by declaring to class, “That story is wack, yo!” he was testing my authority but I didn’t know what to do.” A teacher having no plan for how to discipline children? That seems poorly thought out. Like not planing a lesson. A classroom is full of people, one legal adult, and many minors. Most of them are in a rush to become adults, so treat them as such. I would ensure that they took responsibility for their actions, a good teacher can not let a student walk all over them. I would show them I am in charge by not tolerating any outbursts, they would be punished with detention or seeing the principal. There would be little room for error on the students part. With a well ordered class, we can be productive and make good insightful progress in the material.
Unfortunately, math is pretty boring to most people. They have no interest in learning it and realistically, most students will not use any math skills beyond addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. But if the curriculum is higher level math, how do you spark interest? Frieire states that “Liberating education consists of cognition, not transferrals of information.” The student does not need to memorize math, they must understand it and why it is important. Since math is literally involved in the creation and destruction of every modern object, showing the importance and altering their perception should be strait forward. I would find something that would get attention, like an artillery team performing a strike, or a rocket traveling to space. Something simple, that is loud and powerful. Easily relatable to something most kids are familiar with, destruction. I would then use that example and show the math involved, how math is used, something beyond what they know or understand at that time. There are a number of ways to do this, but the most effective I believe is video. Start with a video and then go from there, get down to the details, spark their interest. And instruct them that they will get to that point as the class progresses. By keeping other examples on the side for when the material is dry, I would be able to re-spark that interest as needed in the classroom.
“To have more young people get an engaging and challenging education,” according to Mike Rose, is a resolution someone should make. This is what I would do. Challenge the students, give them something to take away from the class, and reward them for putting in effort when it is due. There is no need for fancy gimmicks or magic quick knowledge keys that need to be employed. Stick to the simple white board and marker and teaching the material. Kids naturally want to learn, it is in their nature. So if we put the information out, they will learn, and if we challenge them to a level they have not been to, encourage this, put in the extra hours like they may have to, reward them for the extra effort, the child will rise to that expectation. Incentives would curve the enthusiasm, incentives like extra credit, candy, or even no test if the students prove they are doing the work. Simple rewards for effort can make all the difference. If the teacher treats them like respectable adults and gives them more than a grade, but gives them a life lesson that they will remember. So many teachers overlook or over think this. They want to be a students friend, want to be liked, or want their class to be entertaining the entire time. This is ignorant to think possible. With the clash of personalities and often dry material, it is not possible to do. I would treat the class like life, sometimes you win, sometimes you loose, often you are not entertained, sometimes you are on the edge of your seat, sometimes students just don not like you and you do not care for them. But that is life. I would keep the lectures to the point, cover the material, ensure the students grasp the material. And more importantly, be adaptive and receptive to the students needs.
So many teachers simply put out information, they do not really teach it, They do not put in effort to ensure knowledge is passed on to a student, and they do not motivate them. John Gatto says that “We could encourage the best qualities of youthfulness- curiosity, adventure, resilience, the capacity for surprising insight simply by being more flexible about time, texts, tests, by introducing kids to truly competent adults, and by giving each student what autonomy he or she needs in order to take a risk every now and then.” Teachers often expect the mundane day to day of school, comfortable in tenure, not caring whether our youth learns or not. I would defeat this problem by returning to the basics. I would enforce structure and discipline, be respectful and adaptive to needs of students, use incentives to encourage hard work, and use real life scenarios to demonstrate the importance of math in our everyday life. This fundamental approach would be effective. We as a class would beat the monotony of the classroom and actually use our time to wisely and effectively to learn a useful subject that can be applied to a variety of things.
Works Cited
Brown, Dan. “What Makes A Great Teacher?” wjla.com. ABC7., 31 August 2012. Web. 6 December 2012
Freire, Paolo. Pedagogy Of The Oppressed. City of Westminster, London
Penguin Education Publishing. 25 January 1996. Print.
Gato, John Taylor. “Against School: How Public Education Cripples our Kids, and Why”. http://harpers.org. Harpers Magazine. September 2003. Web. 6 December 2012.
Large, Jerry. “Gift of Grit curiosity help kids succeed character helps kids succeed and it can be taught” Seattle Times. Seattle. 23 September 2012.
Rose, Mike. “Resolutions Someone Should Make for 2011” cited in Valerie Stauss’s blog: “The Answer Sheet” from The Washington Post
---. Lives on the Boundary. New York. Simon and Schuster. 1889. Print