Saturday, November 24, 2012


A Real Education
Has the basic education of our youth fallen so far from our natural roots that we actually need this crap for school age children? The concept of inherent mindfulness seems overkill to even need to teach a child. Boyce says “that inherent mindfulness helps us to realize that we live in an interconnected world and puts us in touch with the golden rule.” Those basic life concepts, treat others as you want to be treated, we all live on tis earth so we need to get along, are thing that parents should be instilling in their children from birth on. Kids should know right an wrong when they start school, or at least understand to question something they don’t understand. Is it really necessary to take away from academic learning in school so that a ten year old can learn what their parents should have taught them when they were two? Not to say that yoga isn’t a worthwhile exercise, but if a child can’t learn proper social behaviors and how to react to problems by time they go to school, their parents are to blame, and the whole of society should not be responsible for teaching basic human skills to every kid. 

Tuesday, November 20, 2012


Grit
The world needs more free range kids. There are a lot of protective parents, keeping a close ye on their children. Parents that keep their kid from living, in a sense, and making there own mistakes. Time and time again we can see it, that kid that just graduated high school, went off to college, or joined the military, or got a job for the first time, and we see it instantly, they fail. They have no challenge until it hits them in the face. Large is right, the kids who aren’t faced with the right amount of adversity fail. Large states “Too much adversity is bad, but so is too little, which doesn’t allow a child to build grit.” If a child sees nothing but failure, and doesn’t learn to overcome it, that negative stigma will be all they know, and then it is just the opposite with a kid that only knows success will not be able to deal with failure when it inevitably occurs. Teaching children the moral ins and outs of the fabric of society, how to deal with its many problems and faults, is not tested, and is therefore often skipped in early development. We owe it to ourselves to tech this important lesson to todays youth. 

Smitherman’s Ideas and the Film
The film portrays the flaws in our countries education system. But Smitherman had linguistic issues in her education due to speaking another language, ebonics. At the time she was educated, it wasn’t considered another dialect of English. If she thinks it should be taught and if it is spoken you should be catered to in your native tongue, she i wrong. If a kid goes to a public school and doesn’t speak the language that the majority speaks and what the school is taught in, then that’s too bad and their parents need to take responsibility for that and resolve it. The system should not be changed because a few people feel segregated. If we even attempted to please everyone, we would fail, that’s why we live in a democracy, majority rules. Simple concept. Are teachers wrong for not recognizing this soft of difference, yes, but although they should help, a teacher is not responsible for everyone. If the minority can not get their act together, that’s their problem, when it becomes the majority, then it is the teacher. Though the education system isn’t without its problems, another large factor starts right at home, if a child's parents aren’t taking their education seriously, then they will likely fail. 

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Best Work due 10/11
Malcolm X’s “Learning to Read” was the better of the works, not only is it the most interesting to read, it has the best story of overcoming adversity of the three.  Going from a street hustler to a self-taught well educated, influential person is an impressive task. Something that struck me in particular was that he realized his weakness and started from the bottom. Malcolm X states “I saw that the best thing I could do was get hold of a dictionary-to study.” A dictionary, the most basic of educational reading, but he read it, copied from it, made himself better. As he improved, learned, read books, wrote, Malcolm X says he “never had been so truly free in my life.” To be free in prison? That is a person that knows what he wants. That kind of dedication, drive to learn, drive to overcome to be better than you were and actually be able to contribute to society, that is what the world needs more of. From nothing beginnings, he becomes one of the most influential men in the civil rights movement. He says “You will never catch me with a free fifteen minutes in which I’m not studying something I feel might be able to help the black man.” He is an inspiring person, this is why I enjoyed his work the best.

Monday, November 5, 2012




A Good Teacher
  
                When we look at education in the American culture, we see that it has several oppositions from various sources. Oppositions such as money, location, children’s economic status, crime rate in the school’s location, government backing, and the list goes on. But do these things affect the outcome of the education of the children. No, the real source of education is not money or social status or location of the building, it is the teachers. They are what make the difference when faced with hardships in schools. What makes a good teacher? We look at the fictional characters Mr. Escalante, from the film “Stand and Deliver” (who is based on a real person) and Mr. Keating, from the film “Dead Poets Society.” Both were excellent teachers, and if we analyze their character, both were excellent teachers because of their knowledge of a subject, passion to teach, and ability to teach different students. A successful teacher is one who is knowledgeable and passionate about their topic, and more importantly, can invoke thought and understanding of that topic to a variety of students with different learning styles and capabilities. 
               Mr. Escalante gave up a better paying job to teach mathematics at a school in the ghetto. He risked his safety by going there due to gang activity; he even had his car burglarized on the first day. When he is finally allowed to teach calculus, he puts in extra hours, makes his students sign contracts and get parental consent to do those hours. Clearly he is dedicated to his cause. When we look at Mr. Keating, we see many similarities in dedication. Though he is not physically in danger at Welton Academy, we get the impression that he did not like it there as a student when he tells his students that he too graduated from “Hellton Academy.” Mr. Keating also states several times in the film "I love to teach." Making difficult sacrifices to a largely thankless and low paying job is commitment. When someone is passionate about something such as teaching, they commit to making it better for the student and they become a better teacher. These two teachers are portrayed as being top in their field to the viewer, and this is largely because of their passion for teaching.
                Any teacher can read the facts of a subject to a bunch of kids and say the students learned the material. But it takes much more than just reciting a text book to get a student to think about the material, to wonder the why’s, to see the practicality of math, to understand what an artist is really depicting in their painting. Mr. Escalante shows the students that math is important and useful; he tells them “they must learn calculus to get a good job.” Escalante also uses analogies the student would know, such as the “gigolos” which he used in his basic math class to show students how numbers can matter. Relating the subject to real life is a proven method for Education. Mr. Keating uses another approach, still effective but slightly different. In the film when Mr. Keating assigns a poem to be written, one of his students does not complete the assignment. So Mr. Keating puts him on the spot in front of the class and asks him questions to create a poem. As the student answers, he articulates his response and makes poetry out of his actual feelings about the questions. This ability to relate the topic to where it fits in life is a vital tool, one that many textbook reciting teachers cannot do. It is an invaluable trait that great teachers all possess. 
                Often there are students that do not have a desire to learn a topic, whether it is English, mathematics, history, or any other topic, those students end up being difficult, hindering others, and negatively affecting the outcome of the class. Being able to get students like this to think about the material, to actually put forth some effort into learning it, can be a near impossible task. Mr. Escalante does this using a tough love approach. He singles the students out when they act out about learning, he put one girl at the front of the room when she refused to take a quiz, he got in the face of a guy who was a known affiliate of a gang, threatened him, called him out by making it obvious how ignorant he was to the rest of the class. He used their lack of understanding of the topic to make them feel as though they needed to know it. Mr. Keating used a similar approach, but his used their knowledge against them in a different way. In the film when Mr. Keating assigns the poem, one of the boys in the class gives a simple, effortless poem, he had obviously not taken the writing seriously and presented a joke. But he did not understand poetry; in front of the class Mr. Keating explained the significance of such a poem, what it can really mean, that it was not a joke. Mr. Keating essentially brought him into the reality of the subject and the impact it could have. These teachers effectively used their knowledge of a subject and their ability to play a student’s abilities and weaknesses to get them to take the class seriously and actually learn something.
                Few teachers possess all of the qualities to get through to a student, to really make them think about a subject and relate it to real life scenarios. Most teachers have knowledge, but cannot always relate it. Many can just recite the words in the book picked by the school district. But there are very few that have a passion and the social understanding to relate to youth and actually educate them. This kind of ability is truly what makes a successful teacher. A teacher with the knowledge and passion to get through to all of their students, through a variety of methods that can deeply impact youth, is a vital person in our complex society.  

                                                                                                 Works Cited
                                                                                                                   
Stand and Deliver. Dir. Ramon Menendez. Perf. Edward James Olmos, Lou Diamond Phillips American Playhouse, 1988. DVD. 
                                                         
Dead Poets Society. Dir. Peter Weir. Perf. Robin Williams, Robert Sean Leonard, Ethan Hawke. Touchstone Pictures, 1989. DVD.



Sunday, November 4, 2012


Freire on Standardized Testing
Based on Freire’s “The Banking Concept of Education,” he would not only be against an increase in standardized testing, but in that form of testing all together. Standardized testing in essence is the definition of the banking concept, which Freire defines as regarding "men as adaptable, manageable beings," people doing what they are told, storing factual information and adapting to what stored information if needed in the shaped society. Standardized tests make education a basic numbers game, if you score this high, you are smart, if not, you are not. How is that education? Who is making this standard of intellect? Freire talks of the students being “containers” to be “filled” by their teachers and how this narration leads to mechanical memorization. We do not learn and are not taught the how and why of what we are learning. Freire states "The capability of banking education to minimize or annul the students creative power and to stimulate their credulity serves the interests of the oppressors. Standardized tests are a multiple choice, only one answer test, this can't really gauge the intelligence of a person, they are not creative, they were likely put in place by some evil bureaucrat. Of course two plus two is four, and nouns will always be a person place or thing, but that is memorization that anyone can do given enough time. If they do not understand why math does what it does or what a writer is saying in their work, what use is the person to society. Freire would not support this, these types of tests would be the opposite of what he believes education should be.

Teachers Similarities and Differences
Mr. Escalante and Mr. Keating have many differences, but even though they taught different subjects at very different times in history, they share similarities as well. Both teachers share a rare passion for the subject they teach and having the ability to teach it. Mr. Escalante puts in extra hours, fights to teach advanced classes even though his superiors do not believe it to be worth while. Mr. Keating states several times “I love to teach” and even lives long distance from his significant other to teach at Welton Academy. This type of passion in teachers is rare and makes for an excellent teacher. But they are extremely different teachers. Mr. Escalante teaches higher level math to kids to get them out of their current situation, to get them a good job, in a sense, he supports the machine of society. Mr. Keating teaches students to be free thinkers, carpe diem. He attempts to teach teenage boys that life is not about being part of the expected society, it is about seizing that moment to potentially have something great come out of it. Both teachers have a great passion and ability to teach their choosen topics, but their major life lesson differs greatly.